[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+icZUUP6ZNQN62aqHr3DKzFJmw7QjmkuquToLydg__iiXmNfA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 12:37:05 +0200
From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 2
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20130701:
>
> The powerpc tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
> next-20130701.
>
> The regulator tree lost its build failure.
>
> The arm-soc tree gained conflicts against the l2-mtd tree.
>
> The renesas tree gained a conflict against the arm tree.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
When has this changed from drm-intel-next-queued (old) to for-linux-next (new)?
I was astonished I see still the issue of yesterday.
- Sedat -
[1] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/Next/Trees?id=next-20130702#n120
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists