[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0000013f9fbd247d-8de715f1-e0dc-47fb-8f06-af6c061044be-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 14:15:42 +0000
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm/slub: Fix slub calculate active slabs
uncorrectly
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> Before patch:
> Active / Total Slabs (% used) : 59018 / 59018 (100.0%)
>
> After patch:
> Active / Total Slabs (% used) : 11086 / 11153 (99.4%)
Yes I saw that.
> These numbers are dump from slabtop for monitor slub, before patch Active / Total
> Slabs are always 100%, this is not truth since empty slabs present. However, the
> slab allocator can caculate its Active / Total Slabs correctly and its value is
> less than 100.0%. By comparison, slub is more efficient than slab through slabtop
> observation, however, it is not truth since slub uncorrectly calculate its
> Active / Total Slabs.
I always thought about the "empty" slabs to be active since they are used
for allocation and frees like the other partial slabs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists