[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130702110628.5dbb75e0@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 11:06:28 -0400
From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mhocko@...e.cz,
minchan@...nel.org, anton@...msg.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vmpressure: implement strict mode
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013 10:51:03 +0200
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > diff --git a/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt b/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
> > index ddf4f93..3c589cf 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
> > @@ -807,12 +807,14 @@ register a notification, an application must:
> >
> > - create an eventfd using eventfd(2);
> > - open memory.pressure_level;
> > -- write string like "<event_fd> <fd of memory.pressure_level> <level>"
> > +- write string like "<event_fd> <fd of memory.pressure_level> <level> [strict]"
> > to cgroup.event_control.
> >
>
> This is.. pretty strange interface. Would it be cleaner to do ioctl()?
> New syscall?
Are you referring to my new mode or to the whole thing?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists