[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130702153229.GG7013@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 18:32:29 +0300
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: Luciano Coelho <coelho@...com>
CC: <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, <tony@...mide.com>,
<nsekhar@...com>, <mturquette@...aro.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<balbi@...com>, <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
<rob.herring@...xeda.com>, <devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] wlcore: always use one-shot IRQ
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 05:55:44PM +0300, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> Since we are now using threaded IRQs without the primary handler, we
> need to set IRQF_ONESHOT, otherwise our request will fail.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <coelho@...com>
good to see this happening, I remember we talked about this a while back
:-)
Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
Still, if you call irq_set_irq_type() on board-file (since DT will do
something similar for you anyway) then you can completely drop
irq_flags.
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists