[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51D24318.40908@atmel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 11:03:52 +0800
From: Bo Shen <voice.shen@...el.com>
To: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
CC: <devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 02/13] misc: atmel_ssc: keep the count of pdev->id
Hi Richard,
On 7/1/2013 16:39, Richard Genoud wrote:
> With device tree, pdev->id is always -1, so we introduce a local
> counter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c b/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c
> index 3afbd82..d1ec5ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c
> @@ -173,6 +173,12 @@ out:
> return err;
> }
>
> +/* counter of ssc devive instances.
> + * With device tree pdev->id is always -1, so we have to keep the
> + * count ourselves
> + */
> +static int ssc_device_id;
Do we really need this? If Yes, would it better to get from device
through of_alias_get_id?
> +
> static int ssc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct resource *regs;
> @@ -235,6 +241,7 @@ static int ssc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> spin_lock(&user_lock);
> + pdev->id = ssc_device_id++;
> list_add_tail(&ssc->list, &ssc_list);
> spin_unlock(&user_lock);
>
>
Best Regards,
Bo Shen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists