linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] wl12xx: use frequency instead of enumerations for pdata clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 2 Jul 2013 23:27:30 +0300
From:	Luciano Coelho <coelho@...com>
To:	Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
CC:	<linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, <tony@...mide.com>,
	<nsekhar@...com>, <mturquette@...aro.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
	<balbi@...com>, <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	<rob.herring@...xeda.com>, <devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] wl12xx: use frequency instead of enumerations
 for pdata clocks

On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 10:02 -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 17:55-20130702, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> > Instead of defining an enumeration with the FW specific values for the
> > different clock rates, use the actual frequency instead.  Also add a
> > boolean to specify whether the clock is XTAL or not.
> > 
> > Change all board files to reflect this.
> > 
> > Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
> > Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
> > Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <coelho@...com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c      |    3 +-
> >  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c          |    5 ++-
> ^^
> >  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c         |    3 +-
> >  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c       |    3 +-
> ^^
> Please do not add more platform data to platforms that are DT only.

Ah, I hadn't realized that board_omap4panda.c and board-4430sdp.c had
been removed in linux-next.  I base my tree on wireless-next and it
doesn't contain these changes yet.  I would only have noticed this when
I rebased my tree once the merge window is closed. ;)

Thanks for pointing out, I'll make sure these changes will not be there
when I send the pull request.

--
Cheers,
Luca.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/