[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5B7Yx7tRy8Q5wi6ngcD0FDJzKXHOEGPXyUo52+f3oUHEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 18:01:12 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Thomas Zeitlhofer <thomas.zeitlhofer@...tuwien.ac.at>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jasowang@...hat.com
Subject: Re: tuntap regression in v3.9.8 and v3.10
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Thomas Zeitlhofer
<thomas.zeitlhofer@...tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
> Commit "tuntap: set SOCK_ZEROCOPY flag during open" introduces a
> regression which is observed with live migration of qemu/kvm based
> virtual machines that are connected to an openvswitch bridge.
>
> Reverting this commit (b26c93c46a3dec25ed236d4ba6107eb4ed5d9401 in
> v3.9.8 and accordingly 19a6afb23e5d323e1245baa4e62755492b2f1200 in
> v3.10) fixes the following problem:
Should the sock_set_flag stay in tun_set_iff as it was prior to 54f968d6efd?
--- a/drivers/net/tun.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
@@ -1652,6 +1652,7 @@ static int tun_set_iff(struct net *net, struct
file *file, struct ifreq *ifr)
tun->txflt.count = 0;
tun->vnet_hdr_sz = sizeof(struct virtio_net_hdr);
+ sock_set_flag(&tfile->sk, SOCK_ZEROCOPY);
tun->filter_attached = false;
tun->sndbuf = tfile->socket.sk->sk_sndbuf;
@@ -2159,8 +2160,6 @@ static int tun_chr_open(struct inode *inode,
struct file * file)
set_bit(SOCK_EXTERNALLY_ALLOCATED, &tfile->socket.flags);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tfile->next);
- sock_set_flag(&tfile->sk, SOCK_ZEROCOPY);
-
return 0;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists