[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130702213208.GC10388@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 00:32:08 +0300
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: Luciano Coelho <coelho@...com>
CC: <balbi@...com>, <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
<tony@...mide.com>, <nsekhar@...com>, <mturquette@...aro.org>,
<mark.rutland@....com>, <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
<rob.herring@...xeda.com>, <devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] wlcore: sdio: get clocks from device tree
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 11:19:54PM +0300, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 18:35 +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 05:55:47PM +0300, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> > > @@ -294,6 +316,8 @@ static int wl1271_probe(struct sdio_func *func,
> > > /* Use block mode for transferring over one block size of data */
> > > func->card->quirks |= MMC_QUIRK_BLKSZ_FOR_BYTE_MODE;
> > >
> > > + sdio_set_drvdata(func, glue);
> >
> > is this move really necessary ?
>
> It is, because I use the glue in wlcore_get_pdata_from_of(), so I need
> to call sdio_set_drvdata() earlier. I reckoned it wouldn't hurt to move
> this, so I wouldn't have to pass the glue in the
> wlcore_get_pdata_from_of() call.
that's alright, it does look like it deserves a mention in changelog
though. Other than that:
Reviewed-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists