linux-kernel - Re: [v3.9] [v3.10] [Regression] serial: 8250_pci: add support for another kind of NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Multi-I/O Controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130702044641.GA6549@udknight>
Date:	Tue, 2 Jul 2013 12:46:41 +0800
From:	Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>
To:	Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>
Cc:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, jslaby@...e.cz,
	alan@...ux.intel.com, matts@...mtech-fastcom.com,
	wfp5p@...ginia.edu, tklauser@...tanz.ch,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v3.9] [v3.10] [Regression]  serial: 8250_pci: add support for
 another kind of NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Multi-I/O Controller

On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 12:14:45PM -0400, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> Hi Wang,
> 
> A bug was opened against the Ubuntu kernel[0].  After a kernel bisect,
> it was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug:
> 
> commit 8d2f8cd424ca0b99001f3ff4f5db87c4e525f366
> Author: Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>
> Date:   Fri Mar 1 11:47:20 2013 +0800
> 
>     serial: 8250_pci: add support for another kind of NetMos Technology
> PCI 9835 Multi-I/O Controller
> 
> 
> The regression was introduced as of v3.9-rc3 and still exists in the
> current Mainline tree.  It was also propagated to the stable trees.
> 
> The patch causes the device to use the serial module instead of
> parport_serial.  Maybe the the quirk in ~drivers/pci/quirks.c
> quirk_netmos() needs to be modified?
> 
> I see that you are the author of this patch, so I wanted to run this by
> you.  I was thinking of requesting a revert, but I wanted to get your
> feedback first.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joe
Hi all,
I am sorry for it and later reply.

But I am sure I have included the parport_serial in the
kernel for my consumers at the time they report their
PCI 9835 Multi-I/O Controller didn't work which cause
this "culprit" patch.

I don't have the card in hand right now, so I can't
dig into it. After stare into parport_serial.c, yes,
it seems like it will handle this pci serial card.

Maybe I forget or miss something, I hope.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/