[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130702055839.GZ3773@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 22:58:39 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, darren@...art.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
sbw@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC nohz_full v2 2/7] nohz_full: Add rcu_dyntick data for
scalable detection of all-idle state
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 07:10:52AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 12:16 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 11:34:13AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
>
> > > > > This also naturally raises the question "How can we let userspace get
> > > > > accurate time without forcing a timer tick?".
> > > >
> > > > We don't. ;-)
> > >
> > > We don't currently, hence my question about how we can. :)
> >
> > Per-CPU atomic clocks?
>
> Great idea, who needs timekeeping code.
>
> http://www.euronews.com/2013/04/02/swiss-sets-sights-on-miniscule-atomic-clock/
"in theory you’ll only need to set it once every 3,000 years, providing
of course your battery lasts that long" ;-) ;-) ;-)
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists