lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1372854803.22042.22.camel@chaos.site>
Date:	Wed, 03 Jul 2013 14:33:23 +0200
From:	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
To:	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
Cc:	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: modalias char-major-10-130

Hi Wim,

All watchdog drivers include:

MODULE_ALIAS_MISCDEV(WATCHDOG_MINOR);

which causes a modalias char-major-10-130 to be added to every watchdog
driver module. As a result, any access to /dev/watchdog on a system with
no watchdog driver loaded and working will result in an attempt to load
several dozen drivers. At best one or two will actually work, the others
will:

* Waste time failing to load.
* Waste memory succeeding to load but not finding any device to bind to.
* Pollute the kernel log.
* Sometimes even load while they should not and break the system. I just
had a report about advantechwdt doing that on some systems.

And the attempt order will presumably be random, so it might as well
load softdog before a hardware-based watchdog which would have been
preferred.

This looks so 90s. Drivers for enumerated devices have hardware-based
modaliases, so char-major-10-130 shouldn't be needed. Other drivers
should certainly not be loaded randomly if they need to poke the
hardware to detect the presence of a supported device.

My opinion is that the char-major-10-130 modalias should ONLY be defined
by user-space, when the user knows he/she needs a watchdog driver which
doesn't support auto-loading via hardware-based auto-loading.

So, can we please get rid of all these
MODULE_ALIAS_MISCDEV(WATCHDOG_MINOR) statements? They do more harm than
good as far as I can see.

Thanks,
-- 
Jean Delvare
Suse L3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ