lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALZhoSQb9mOm0+rYhgEfF74WkVW2Vkdb+ZE2cAECMs3Z9cqZ+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 3 Jul 2013 20:46:11 +0800
From:	Lei Wen <adrian.wenl@...il.com>
To:	Lei Wen <leiwen@...vell.com>
Cc:	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, mingo@...hat.com,
	Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [V3 1/2] sched: add trace events for task and rq usage tracking

Hi Peter,

Do you have some further suggestion for this patch? :)

Thanks,
Lei

On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Lei Wen <leiwen@...vell.com> wrote:
> Since we could track task in the entity level now, we may want to
> investigate tasks' running status by recording the trace info, so that
> could make some tuning if needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lei Wen <leiwen@...vell.com>
> Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  include/trace/events/sched.h |   76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/sched/fair.c          |   15 +++++++--
>  2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/sched.h b/include/trace/events/sched.h
> index e5586ca..768b398 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/sched.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/sched.h
> @@ -430,6 +430,82 @@ TRACE_EVENT(sched_pi_setprio,
>                         __entry->oldprio, __entry->newprio)
>  );
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +TRACE_EVENT(sched_task_weighted_load,
> +
> +       TP_PROTO(struct sched_entity *se),
> +
> +       TP_ARGS(se),
> +
> +       TP_STRUCT__entry(
> +               __field(pid_t, pid)
> +               __field(int, cpu)
> +               __field(unsigned long, load)
> +               __field(unsigned long, weight)
> +       ),
> +
> +       TP_fast_assign(
> +               __entry->pid   = container_of(se, struct task_struct, se)->pid;
> +               __entry->cpu   = se->cfs_rq->rq->cpu;
> +               __entry->load  = se->avg.load_avg_contrib;
> +               __entry->weight= se->load.weight;
> +       ),
> +
> +       TP_printk("cpu=%d pid=%d load=%lu weight=%lu",
> +                       __entry->cpu, __entry->pid,
> +                       __entry->load, __entry->weight)
> +);
> +
> +TRACE_EVENT(sched_cfs_rq_runnable_load,
> +
> +       TP_PROTO(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq),
> +
> +       TP_ARGS(cfs_rq),
> +
> +       TP_STRUCT__entry(
> +               __field(int, cpu)
> +               __field(unsigned long, load)
> +               __field(unsigned long, total)
> +       ),
> +
> +       TP_fast_assign(
> +               __entry->cpu   = cfs_rq->rq->cpu;
> +               __entry->load  = cfs_rq->runnable_load_avg;
> +               __entry->total = cfs_rq->load.weight;
> +       ),
> +
> +       TP_printk("cpu=%d avg=%lu total=%lu",
> +               __entry->cpu,
> +               __entry->load,
> +               __entry->total)
> +);
> +
> +TRACE_EVENT(sched_cfs_rq_blocked_load,
> +
> +       TP_PROTO(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq),
> +
> +       TP_ARGS(cfs_rq),
> +
> +       TP_STRUCT__entry(
> +               __field(int, cpu)
> +               __field(unsigned long, load)
> +               __field(unsigned long, total)
> +       ),
> +
> +       TP_fast_assign(
> +               __entry->cpu   = cfs_rq->rq->cpu;
> +               __entry->load  = cfs_rq->blocked_load_avg;
> +               __entry->total = cfs_rq->blocked_load_avg
> +                               + cfs_rq->runnable_load_avg;
> +       ),
> +
> +       TP_printk("cpu=%d avg=%lu total=%lu",
> +               __entry->cpu,
> +               __entry->load,
> +               __entry->total)
> +);
> +#endif
> +
>  #endif /* _TRACE_SCHED_H */
>
>  /* This part must be outside protection */
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index f77f9c5..2290469 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -1346,6 +1346,7 @@ static inline u64 __synchronize_entity_decay(struct sched_entity *se)
>                 return 0;
>
>         se->avg.load_avg_contrib = decay_load(se->avg.load_avg_contrib, decays);
> +       trace_sched_task_weighted_load(se);
>         se->avg.decay_count = 0;
>
>         return decays;
> @@ -1445,6 +1446,7 @@ static inline void __update_task_entity_contrib(struct sched_entity *se)
>         contrib = se->avg.runnable_avg_sum * scale_load_down(se->load.weight);
>         contrib /= (se->avg.runnable_avg_period + 1);
>         se->avg.load_avg_contrib = scale_load(contrib);
> +       trace_sched_task_weighted_load(se);
>  }
>
>  /* Compute the current contribution to load_avg by se, return any delta */
> @@ -1498,10 +1500,13 @@ static inline void update_entity_load_avg(struct sched_entity *se,
>         if (!update_cfs_rq)
>                 return;
>
> -       if (se->on_rq)
> +       if (se->on_rq) {
>                 cfs_rq->runnable_load_avg += contrib_delta;
> -       else
> +               trace_sched_cfs_rq_runnable_load(cfs_rq);
> +       } else {
>                 subtract_blocked_load_contrib(cfs_rq, -contrib_delta);
> +               trace_sched_cfs_rq_blocked_load(cfs_rq);
> +       }
>  }
>
>  /*
> @@ -1531,6 +1536,7 @@ static void update_cfs_rq_blocked_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int force_update)
>         }
>
>         __update_cfs_rq_tg_load_contrib(cfs_rq, force_update);
> +       trace_sched_cfs_rq_blocked_load(cfs_rq);
>  }
>
>  static inline void update_rq_runnable_avg(struct rq *rq, int runnable)
> @@ -1584,10 +1590,12 @@ static inline void enqueue_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
>         /* migrated tasks did not contribute to our blocked load */
>         if (wakeup) {
>                 subtract_blocked_load_contrib(cfs_rq, se->avg.load_avg_contrib);
> +               trace_sched_cfs_rq_blocked_load(cfs_rq);
>                 update_entity_load_avg(se, 0);
>         }
>
>         cfs_rq->runnable_load_avg += se->avg.load_avg_contrib;
> +       trace_sched_cfs_rq_runnable_load(cfs_rq);
>         /* we force update consideration on load-balancer moves */
>         update_cfs_rq_blocked_load(cfs_rq, !wakeup);
>  }
> @@ -1608,6 +1616,7 @@ static inline void dequeue_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
>         cfs_rq->runnable_load_avg -= se->avg.load_avg_contrib;
>         if (sleep) {
>                 cfs_rq->blocked_load_avg += se->avg.load_avg_contrib;
> +               trace_sched_cfs_rq_blocked_load(cfs_rq);
>                 se->avg.decay_count = atomic64_read(&cfs_rq->decay_counter);
>         } /* migrations, e.g. sleep=0 leave decay_count == 0 */
>  }
> @@ -5894,6 +5903,7 @@ static void switched_from_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>                 __synchronize_entity_decay(&p->se);
>                 subtract_blocked_load_contrib(cfs_rq,
>                                 p->se.avg.load_avg_contrib);
> +               trace_sched_cfs_rq_blocked_load(cfs_rq);
>         }
>  #endif
>  }
> @@ -5994,6 +6004,7 @@ static void task_move_group_fair(struct task_struct *p, int on_rq)
>                  */
>                 p->se.avg.decay_count = atomic64_read(&cfs_rq->decay_counter);
>                 cfs_rq->blocked_load_avg += p->se.avg.load_avg_contrib;
> +               trace_sched_cfs_rq_blocked_load(cfs_rq);
>  #endif
>         }
>  }
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ