linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix a build warning in scripts/sortextable.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51D41FA7.80209@suse.cz>
Date:	Wed, 03 Jul 2013 14:57:11 +0200
From:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
To:	Daniel Tang <dt.tangr@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	trivial@...nel.org, David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix a build warning in scripts/sortextable.h

On 3.7.2013 14:37, Daniel Tang wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 03/07/2013, at 10:28 PM, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> What is the type of Elf64_Shdr::sh_offset in OS X's <elf.h>? In
>> glibc, this is Elf64_Off, which is a typedef name for uint64_t.
> 
> Huh, that's weird. Elf64_Off is defined as unsigned long in my elf.h
> which isn't 64 bit on x86_64 pretty sure.

unsigned long _is_ 64bit on x86_64 Linux (or any 64bit Linux), but it
might not be the case on OS X. But then, the <elf.h> on that platform
should use something that is actually 64bit for Elf64_Off.


> It's a problem on my side then, apologies.

If Elf64_Off is really defined as an 32bit integer on OS X, then yes.

Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/