lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130703114956.53b40a7374fe007df84548dd@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Wed, 3 Jul 2013 11:49:56 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-cachefs@...hat.com,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	milosz@...in.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Fix assorted FS-Cache issues

On Wed, 03 Jul 2013 01:12:13 +0100 David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> > >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git tags/fscache-20130702
> > 
> > /me wonders where this has been hiding for the last month and a half ...
> 
> I asked you to pull my fscache branch on the 23rd May, and you replied on the
> 27th May saying you'd done so.

And in linux-next, I keep fetching the same branch every day to get
updates.  It is polite (in fact necessary) for you to keep that branch up
to date if you change things.  You did not update that branch until today
which is what confused me.  The *commits* you sent Linus have never been
in linux-next even though the *patches* have.

Not a biggie, just makes it a bit hard to keep track.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ