linux-kernel - Re: [Cocci] [PATCH 3/3] Coccinelle: Update the options used to the new option scheme

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51D42F71.9030701@suse.cz>
Date:	Wed, 03 Jul 2013 16:04:33 +0200
From:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
To:	Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>
Cc:	Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH 3/3] Coccinelle: Update the options used to the
 new option scheme

On 3.7.2013 15:52, Nicolas Palix wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz> wrote:
>> On 20.6.2013 13:10, Nicolas Palix wrote:
>>> spatch has changed its option scheme.
>>> E.g., --no_show_diff is now --no-show-diff
>>>
>>> This patch updates:
>>>  - scripts/coccicheck
>>>  - Semantic patches under scripts/coccinelle/
>>
>> Will the new syntax work with older spatch versions?
>> I mean, it's
>> probably fair to require a recent version, but it should be documented IMO.
> 
> It is the opposite. The new spatch still supports the old
> naming scheme. The more conventional naming has been introduced
> in spatch version 1.0.0-rc11 in March 2012. I will send a new patch to
> document that point.

Thanks.


>> Also, there was no patch 2/3 in this series, only 1/3 and 3/3.
> 
> It seems you finally found the v2 of this one. :)

Yes :).

Michal

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/