linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] s390/vmcore: Use ELF header in new memory feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130703141529.GB1460@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 3 Jul 2013 10:15:29 -0400
From:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To:	Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com>,
	Jan Willeke <willeke@...ibm.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] s390/vmcore: Use ELF header in new memory feature

On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 09:59:13AM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 12:23:23 -0400
> Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 09:32:36PM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> > 
> > [..]
> > > +ssize_t elfcorehdr_read(char *buf, size_t count, u64 *ppos)
> > > +{
> > > +	void *src = (void *)(unsigned long)*ppos;
> > > +
> > > +	src = elfcorehdr_newmem ? src : src - OLDMEM_BASE;
> > 
> > Seriously, we need to get rid of all this OLDMEM_BASE logic in s390
> > specific code. For regular kdump, it is no different than x86. Only
> > special handling required for zfcpdump for HSA region.
> > 
> > Why do we need above. Is it to cover the case where elfcorehdr have
> > been prepared by user space? Are elf headers initially stored in
> > reserved region and then swapped. Why do we need to swap these or
> > why kexec-tools could not take care of swapping it.
> 
> I know it is confusing. The "src - OLDMEM_BASE" term is currently
> needed because of the swap issue that we have discussed already. We
> load the ELF header into reserved memory
> [OLDMEM_BASE, OLDMEM_BASE + OLDMEM_SIZE] that is swapped with
> [0, OLDMEM_SIZE]. So the ELF header address has to be adjusted.

Can't kexec-tools could easily do this swapping and modify elfcorehdr=
command line accordingly so that second kernel does not have to do
swapping for ELF headers.

And for PT_LOAD segment swapping, we could use ELF header swapping trick
(again in kexec-tools).

After above two changes I think all the OLD_MEMBASE magic will go away
from s390 code and only HSA region special handling will remain.

This brings it inline with x86 code and it becomes easier to understand
the s390 code. Otherwise there so may special corner cases that it is
easy to get lost.

Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/