| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <51D45454.6090701@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 00:41:56 +0800
From: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
CC: Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Haicheng Li <haicheng.lee@...il.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] PCI: Add hide_device support to pci subsystem.
On 07/04/2013 12:09 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>> With more and more SOCs having pci device integrated into chip (e.g. Intel
>> Atom series), it's useful to add an interface to cleanly hide pci devices from
>> pci device scanning, which is because:
>>
>> 1. phone or tablet OEMs may choose disabling some pci device in the SOC,
>> such as camera ISP in Intel Atom Z2580 chip, and etc.
>> 2. if such disabled devices are not cleanly removed from pci device tree,
>> then pci-core will still try to operate on the relative device control
>> registers while S3 suspend and resume.
>> 3. so hiding such devices from early begining will not only reduce the kernel
>> boot time, but also optimize the latency of system suspend and resume.
>
> Normally the chip provides a way to disable devices by writing a
> configuration register. Then the device doesn't respond when Linux
> enumerates devices, so nothing special is required in the kernel.
> What's different about the Z2580? I'd be surprised if Intel forgot to
> include such a register. Maybe the firmware just isn't smart enough
> to disable the device? If so, it would be better to fix the firmware
> than to add kludges in the kernel.
Agree, it would be great if chipset and firmware could cooperate to
handle this issue. Otherwise the interface may be abused and causes
trouble to PCI hotplug operations because the notation seg:bus:dev.func
isn't reliable. The PCI bus number may reassigned by OS.
>
>> To hide pci devices, just pass such parameters to kernel at boot stage:
>> pci=hide=[<domain>:]<bus>:<slot>.<func>[; ...]
>>
>> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
>> Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/pci.c | 2 ++
>> drivers/pci/pci.h | 2 ++
>> drivers/pci/probe.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 98 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> index a899d8b..e228d00 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> @@ -3915,6 +3915,8 @@ static int __init pci_setup(char *str)
>> pcie_bus_config = PCIE_BUS_PEER2PEER;
>> } else if (!strncmp(str, "pcie_scan_all", 13)) {
>> pci_add_flags(PCI_SCAN_ALL_PCIE_DEVS);
>> + } else if (!strncmp(str, "hide=", 5)) {
>> + pci_hide_devices(str + 5, strlen(str + 5));
>> } else {
>> printk(KERN_ERR "PCI: Unknown option `%s'\n",
>> str);
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
>> index d1182c4..783703a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
>> @@ -317,4 +317,6 @@ static inline int pci_dev_specific_reset(struct pci_dev *dev, int probe)
>> }
>> #endif
>>
>> +void pci_hide_devices(const char *, size_t);
>> +
>> #endif /* DRIVERS_PCI_H */
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> index 70f10fa..4223ef3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>> #include <linux/cpumask.h>
>> #include <linux/pci-aspm.h>
>> #include <asm-generic/pci-bridge.h>
>> +#include <asm/setup.h>
>> #include "pci.h"
>>
>> #define CARDBUS_LATENCY_TIMER 176 /* secondary latency timer */
>> @@ -1352,10 +1353,103 @@ void pci_device_add(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pci_bus *bus)
>> pci_proc_attach_device(dev);
>> }
>>
>> +static LIST_HEAD(pci_hidden_dev_list);
>> +struct pci_hidden_dev {
>> + struct list_head list;
>> + int domain_nr;
>> + int devfn;
>> + unsigned char bus_nr;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void do_pci_hide_device(int domain_nr, unsigned char bus_nr, int devfn)
>> +{
>> + struct pci_hidden_dev *d;
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(d, &pci_hidden_dev_list, list)
>> + if (devfn == d->devfn && bus_nr == d->bus_nr &&
>> + domain_nr == d->domain_nr)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + d = kzalloc(sizeof(*d), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!d)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + d->domain_nr = domain_nr;
>> + d->bus_nr = bus_nr;
>> + d->devfn = devfn;
>> +
>> + list_add_tail(&d->list, &pci_hidden_dev_list);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool init_hidden = true;
>> +
>> +#define PCI_HIDE_PARAM_SIZE COMMAND_LINE_SIZE
>> +static char pci_hide_param[PCI_HIDE_PARAM_SIZE] = {'\0'};
>> +
>> +static void parse_hidden_devices(void)
>> +{
>> + char *p = pci_hide_param;
>> + int seg, bus, slot, func, devfn, count;
>> +
>> + /* parse pci.hide= command-line */
>> + while (*p != '\0') {
>> + count = 0;
>> + if (sscanf(p, "%x:%x:%x.%x%n",
>> + &seg, &bus, &slot, &func, &count) != 4) {
>> + seg = 0;
>> + if (sscanf(p, "%x:%x.%x%n",
>> + &bus, &slot, &func, &count) != 3) {
>> + /* Invalid format */
>> + printk(KERN_ERR "PCI: Can't parse "
>> + "hide parameter: %s\n", p);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + p += count;
>> + devfn = (slot << 3) | func;
>> +
>> + do_pci_hide_device(seg, bus, devfn);
>> + if (*p != ';') {
>> + /* End of param or invalid format */
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + p++;
>> + }
>> + init_hidden = false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool is_device_hidden(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn)
>> +{
>> + struct pci_hidden_dev *d;
>> +
>> + if (unlikely(init_hidden))
>> + parse_hidden_devices();
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(d, &pci_hidden_dev_list, list)
>> + if (d->devfn == devfn && d->bus_nr == bus->number &&
>> + d->domain_nr == pci_domain_nr(bus))
>> + return true;
>> +
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void pci_hide_devices(const char *str, size_t count)
>> +{
>> + if (!str)
>> + return;
>> + if (count > PCI_HIDE_PARAM_SIZE - 1)
>> + count = PCI_HIDE_PARAM_SIZE - 1;
>> + strncpy(pci_hide_param, str, count);
>> + pci_hide_param[count] = '\0';
>> +}
>> +
>> struct pci_dev *__ref pci_scan_single_device(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn)
>> {
>> struct pci_dev *dev;
>>
>> + if (unlikely(is_device_hidden(bus, devfn)))
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> dev = pci_get_slot(bus, devfn);
>> if (dev) {
>> pci_dev_put(dev);
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists