[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130703184124.GD18898@dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 20:41:24 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] mm: numa: Scan pages with elevated page_mapcount
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 03:21:39PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Note that the patch still leaves shared, file-backed in VM_EXEC vmas in
> place guessing that these are shared library pages. Migrating them are
> likely to be of major benefit as generally the expectation would be that
> these are read-shared between caches and that iTLB and iCache pressure is
> generally low.
I'm failing to grasp.. we don't migrate them because migrating them would
likely be beneficial?
Missing a negative somewhere?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists