| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1BAFE6F6C881BF42822005164F1491C33EC4F8CA@DBDE04.ent.ti.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 05:03:05 +0000
From: "Hebbar, Gururaja" <gururaja.hebbar@...com>
To: "Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@...com>
CC: "khilman@...aro.org" <khilman@...aro.org>,
"tony@...mide.com" <tony@...mide.com>,
"Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@...com>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com"
<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
"Bedia, Vaibhav" <vaibhav.bedia@...com>,
"Rajashekhara, Sudhakar" <sudhakar.raj@...com>,
"Grant Likely" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
"Rob Landley" <rob@...dley.net>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
"rtc-linux@...glegroups.com" <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/4] rtc: omap: add rtc wakeup support to alarm events
Hi all,
Kindly ignore this message. It was sent in wrong format.
Sorry for the noise
Regards,
Gururaja
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 10:26:57, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote:
> Below is the code snippet I was referring to
>
>
> From drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c
>
> static struct platform_device_id omap_rtc_devtype[] = {
> {
> .name = DRIVER_NAME,
> },
> [OMAP_RTC_DATA_AM3352_IDX] = {
> .name = "am3352-rtc",
> .driver_data = OMAP_RTC_HAS_KICKER | OMAP_RTC_HAS_IRQWAKEEN,
> },
> [OMAP_RTC_DATA_DA830_IDX] = {
> .name = "da830-rtc",
> .driver_data = OMAP_RTC_HAS_KICKER,
> },
> {},
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, omap_rtc_devtype);
>
> static const struct of_device_id omap_rtc_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "ti,da830-rtc",
> .data = &omap_rtc_devtype[OMAP_RTC_DATA_DA830_IDX],
> },
> { .compatible = "ti,am3352-rtc",
> .data = &omap_rtc_devtype[OMAP_RTC_DATA_AM3352_IDX],
> },
> {},
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, omap_rtc_of_match);
>
>
> From arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi
>
> rtc@...3e000 {
> compatible = "ti,da830-rtc", "ti,am3352-rtc";
> reg = <0x44e3e000 0x1000>;
> interrupts = <75
> 76>;
> ti,hwmods = "rtc";
> };
>
>
> As seen from above snippet, 2 compatible items are specified for
> compatible dt property (ti,da830-rtc" & "ti,am3352-rtc”)
> These are the same compatibles that are mentioned in the of_device_id
> structure inside rtc-omap driver.
>
> What I observed is, if we mention both compatible in the .dtsi file that
> are under one single of_device_id structure, the first match from the
> of_device_id structure is considered (ti,da830-rtc in above case)
>
> To confirm, I switched the 2 compatible inside of_device_id structure as
> below
>
>
> static const struct of_device_id omap_rtc_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "ti,am3352-rtc",
> .data = &omap_rtc_devtype[OMAP_RTC_DATA_AM3352_IDX],
> },
> { .compatible = "ti,da830-rtc",
> .data = &omap_rtc_devtype[OMAP_RTC_DATA_DA830_IDX],
> },
> {},
> };
>
> In this case, the first match from compatible field was chosen
> (ti,am3352-rtc now).
>
>
> Hope this is clear.
>
> Kindly let me know when you are free to discuss.
>
>
> Regards
> Gururaja
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nori, Sekhar
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 11:47 AM
> > To: Hebbar, Gururaja
> > Cc: khilman@...aro.org; tony@...mide.com; Cousson, Benoit; linux-
> > omap@...r.kernel.org; devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org; linux-
> > kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
> > davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com; Bedia, Vaibhav;
> > Rajashekhara, Sudhakar; Grant Likely; Rob Herring; Rob Landley;
> > Alessandro Zummo; rtc-linux@...glegroups.com; linux-
> > doc@...r.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] rtc: omap: add rtc wakeup support to
> > alarm events
> >
> >
> >
> > On 7/2/2013 11:41 AM, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 11:39:28, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
> > >> On 7/2/2013 11:34 AM, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote:
> > >>> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 11:32:34, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
> > >>>> On 6/28/2013 3:05 PM, Hebbar Gururaja wrote:
> > >>>>> On some platforms (like AM33xx), a special register
> > (RTC_IRQWAKEEN)
> > >>>>> is available to enable Alarm Wakeup feature. This register
> > needs to be
> > >>>>> properly handled for the rtcwake to work properly.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Platforms using such IP should set "ti,am3352-rtc" in rtc
> > device dt
> > >>>>> compatibility node.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Hebbar Gururaja <gururaja.hebbar@...com
> <mailto:gururaja.hebbar@...com> >
> > >>>>> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org
> <mailto:grant.likely@...aro.org> >
> > >>>>> Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com
> <mailto:rob.herring@...xeda.com> >
> > >>>>> Cc: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net <mailto:rob@...dley.net> >
> > >>>>> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com <mailto:nsekhar@...com> >
> > >>>>> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org <mailto:khilman@...aro.org>
> >
> > >>>>> Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it
> <mailto:a.zummo@...ertech.it> >
> > >>>>> Cc: rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
> <mailto:rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>
> > >>>>> Cc: devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org
> <mailto:devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>
> > >>>>> Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org <mailto:linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
> > >>>>> ---
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [...]
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> -#define OMAP_RTC_DATA_DA830_IDX 1
> > >>>>> +#define OMAP_RTC_DATA_DA830_IDX 1
> > >>>>> +#define OMAP_RTC_DATA_AM335X_IDX 2
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> static struct platform_device_id omap_rtc_devtype[] = {
> > >>>>> {
> > >>>>> @@ -309,6 +321,9 @@ static struct platform_device_id
> > omap_rtc_devtype[] = {
> > >>>>> }, {
> > >>>>> .name = "da830-rtc",
> > >>>>> .driver_data = OMAP_RTC_HAS_KICKER,
> > >>>>> + }, {
> > >>>>> + .name = "am335x-rtc",
> > >>>>
> > >>>> may be use am3352-rtc here just to keep the platform device
> > name and of
> > >>>> compatible in sync.
> > >>>
> > >>> Correct. I will update the same in v2.
> > >>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> + .driver_data = OMAP_RTC_HAS_KICKER |
> > OMAP_RTC_HAS_IRQWAKEEN,
> > >>>>> },
> > >>>>> {},
> > >>>>
> > >>>> It is better to use the index defined above in the static
> > initialization
> > >>>> so they remain in sync.
> > >>>
> > >>> Sorry. I didn’t get this.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> See example below I provided. If its still not clear, let me
> > know what
> > >> is not clear.
> > >>
> > >>>> ...
> > >>>> [OMAP_RTC_DATA_DA830_IDX] = {
> > >>>> .name = "da830-rtc",
> > >>>> .driver_data = OMAP_RTC_HAS_KICKER,
> > >>>> },
> > >
> > > Thanks for the clarification. In this case will it ok if I
> > update the previous
> > > member also.
> >
> > You dont really reference [0] in omap_rtc_of_match[] so even if
> > you
> > leave it as-is, that's fine with me. I am mostly concerned with
> > the
> > index definitions and initialization order being out of sync and
> > that's
> > really not an issue with [0].
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sekhar
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists