[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130704093211.GN1875@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 10:32:11 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] mm: numa: Scan pages with elevated page_mapcount
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 08:41:24PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 03:21:39PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> > Note that the patch still leaves shared, file-backed in VM_EXEC vmas in
> > place guessing that these are shared library pages. Migrating them are
> > likely to be of major benefit as generally the expectation would be that
> > these are read-shared between caches and that iTLB and iCache pressure is
> > generally low.
>
> I'm failing to grasp.. we don't migrate them because migrating them would
> likely be beneficial?
>
> Missing a negative somewhere?
Yes.
Note that the patch does not migrate shared, file-backed within vmas marked
VM_EXEC as these are generally shared library pages. Migrating such pages
is not beneficial as there is an expectation they are read-shared between
caches and iTLB and iCache pressure is generally low.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists