linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/22] input/ti_am33x_tsc: Order of TSC wires, made configurable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51D5864E.20401@ti.com>
Date:	Thu, 4 Jul 2013 19:57:26 +0530
From:	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
CC:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@...com>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-input@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/22] input/ti_am33x_tsc: Order of TSC wires, made configurable

On 7/4/2013 7:20 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 07/04/2013 03:39 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> Yes, I noticed that after sending the mail. To me it does not make sense
>> to make changes to accept something as platform data only to remove
>> platform data itself later.
> 
> The patches were made earlier and it was easier that way to take
> everything and simple remove the platform part later.

Okay, then. If the maintainers do not have objection, I am fine too!

Regards,
Sekhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/