[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51D5DEE7.2070400@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 23:45:27 +0300
From: Luciano Coelho <coelho@...com>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
CC: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] clk: export __clk_get_flags for modular clock
providers
Hi,
On 04/15/2013 09:59 AM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> The common clock api provides some helpers for clk-providers but does
> not export these helpers. This hinders clk-providers to be built as modules.
> This patch adds __clk_get_flags() to the list of exported symbols.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
> ---
> Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index ed87b24..3e478b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -450,6 +450,7 @@ unsigned long __clk_get_flags(struct clk *clk)
> {
> return !clk ? 0 : clk->flags;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__clk_get_flags);
>
> bool __clk_is_enabled(struct clk *clk)
> {
>
I think this got merged slightly wrong. The EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL macro
came under clk_unprepare_unused_subtree() instead of under
__clk_get_flags():
Of course this is not that important, but it's a bit confusing when you
look at the code.
--
Cheers,
Luca.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists