[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130704.143246.1946946036139459725.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 14:32:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: Ian.Campbell@...rix.com, joe.jin@...cle.com, alex@...x.org.uk,
frank.blaschka@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, zheng.x.li@...cle.com,
xen-devel@...ts.xen.org, JBeulich@...e.com,
stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com
Subject: Re: kernel panic in skb_copy_bits
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 03:12:10 -0700
> It looks like a typical COW issue to me.
Generically speaking, if we have to mess with page protections this
eliminates the performance gain from bypass/zerocopy/whatever that
these virtualization layers are doing.
But there may be other factors involved which might mitigate that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists