[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130704042034.GM4165@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 05:20:34 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"Chandramouleeswaran, Aswin" <aswin@...com>,
"Norton, Scott J" <scott.norton@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 24/25] sunrpc: Change how dentry's d_lock field is
accessed
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 04:25:32PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> There is no change in logic and everything should just work.
> - spin_lock(&file->f_path.dentry->d_lock);
> + d_lock(file->f_path.dentry);
> if (!d_unhashed(file->f_path.dentry))
> clnt = RPC_I(inode)->private;
> if (clnt != NULL && atomic_inc_not_zero(&clnt->cl_count)) {
> - spin_unlock(&file->f_path.dentry->d_lock);
> + d_unlock(file->f_path.dentry);
Could somebody explain WTF is being protected here? It's not ->private -
that gets set (and, more importantly, cleared) without ->d_lock in sight.
Trond, that seems to be your code from about three years ago (introduced
in "SUNRPC: Fix a race in rpc_info_open"). What's going on there?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists