lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 5 Jul 2013 11:07:11 +0100
From:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To:	<mingo@...nel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	<john.stultz@...aro.org>, <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
	<tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [tip:timers/core] hrtimers: Support resuming with two or more
 CPUs online (but stopped)

On 05/07/13 10:30, Artem Savkov wrote:
> This commit brings up a warning about a potential deadlock in
> smp_call_function_many() discussed previously:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/18/546

Can we just avoid the wait in clock_was_set()?  Something like this?

8<------------------------------------------------------
hrtimers: do not wait for other CPUs in clock_was_set()

Calling on_each_cpu() and waiting in a softirq causes a WARNing about
a potential deadlock.

Because hrtimers are per-CPU, it is sufficient to ensure that all
other CPUs' timers are reprogrammed as soon as possible and before the
next softirq on that CPU.  There is no need to wait for this to be
complete on all CPUs.

on_each_cpu() works by IPIing all CPUs which will ensure
retrigger_next_event() will be called as earlier as possible and
before the next softirq.

Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
---
 kernel/hrtimer.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/hrtimer.c b/kernel/hrtimer.c
index e86827e..fd5d391 100644
--- a/kernel/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/hrtimer.c
@@ -766,7 +766,7 @@ void clock_was_set(void)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS
 	/* Retrigger the CPU local events everywhere */
-	on_each_cpu(retrigger_next_event, NULL, 1);
+	on_each_cpu(retrigger_next_event, NULL, 0);
 #endif
 	timerfd_clock_was_set();
 }
-- 
1.7.2.5


> 
> [ 4363.082047] PM: Restoring platform NVS memory
> [ 4363.082471] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 4363.083800] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 3977 at kernel/smp.c:385 smp_call_function_many+0xbd/0x2c0()
> [ 4363.085789] Modules linked in:
> [ 4363.086542] CPU: 0 PID: 3977 Comm: pm-suspend Tainted: G        W    3.10.0-next-20130705 #126
> [ 4363.088634] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2007
> [ 4363.090402]  0000000000000181 ffff88001f403d98 ffffffff81d2e2b7 ffffffff821cdb2e
> [ 4363.092366]  0000000000000000 ffff88001f403dd8 ffffffff810a278c ffff88001f403dd8
> [ 4363.094215]  0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff82561898
> [ 4363.096094] Call Trace:
> [ 4363.096656]  <IRQ>  [<ffffffff81d2e2b7>] dump_stack+0x59/0x82
> [ 4363.098259]  [<ffffffff810a278c>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0
> [ 4363.099762]  [<ffffffff810a27da>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
> [ 4363.100925]  [<ffffffff81118fcd>] smp_call_function_many+0xbd/0x2c0
> [ 4363.101937]  [<ffffffff8110f0dd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
> [ 4363.102870]  [<ffffffff810d7030>] ? hrtimer_wakeup+0x30/0x30
> [ 4363.103737]  [<ffffffff811193bb>] smp_call_function+0x3b/0x50
> [ 4363.104609]  [<ffffffff810d7030>] ? hrtimer_wakeup+0x30/0x30
> [ 4363.105455]  [<ffffffff8111943b>] on_each_cpu+0x3b/0x120
> [ 4363.106249]  [<ffffffff810d743c>] clock_was_set+0x1c/0x30
> [ 4363.107168]  [<ffffffff810d825c>] run_hrtimer_softirq+0x2c/0x40
> [ 4363.108055]  [<ffffffff810acf26>] __do_softirq+0x216/0x450
> [ 4363.108865]  [<ffffffff810ad297>] irq_exit+0x77/0xb0
> [ 4363.109618]  [<ffffffff81d414da>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x4a/0x60
> [ 4363.110569]  [<ffffffff81d40032>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x72/0x80
> [ 4363.111467]  <EOI>  [<ffffffff8110eb24>] ? mark_held_locks+0x134/0x160
> [ 4363.112481]  [<ffffffff810f52af>] ? arch_suspend_enable_irqs+0x2f/0x40
> [ 4363.113457]  [<ffffffff810f528e>] ? arch_suspend_enable_irqs+0xe/0x40
> [ 4363.113910]  [<ffffffff810f54c1>] suspend_enter+0x1d1/0x270
> [ 4363.114320]  [<ffffffff810f5794>] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x1a4/0x390
> [ 4363.114887]  [<ffffffff810f5a74>] enter_state+0xf4/0x150
> [ 4363.115288]  [<ffffffff810f5aeb>] pm_suspend+0x1b/0x70
> [ 4363.115662]  [<ffffffff810f452b>] state_store+0xeb/0xf0
> [ 4363.116055]  [<ffffffff815d3fc7>] kobj_attr_store+0x17/0x20
> [ 4363.116468]  [<ffffffff8126f113>] sysfs_write_file+0xb3/0x100
> [ 4363.116890]  [<ffffffff811f0aca>] vfs_write+0xda/0x170
> [ 4363.117274]  [<ffffffff811f10b2>] SyS_write+0x62/0xa0
> [ 4363.117645]  [<ffffffff815e01fe>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
> [ 4363.118118]  [<ffffffff81d3f399>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> [ 4363.118558] ---[ end trace 87cc49a77badea1e ]---
> [ 4363.119093] Enabling non-boot CPUs ...
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 02:18:37PM -0700, tip-bot for David Vrabel wrote:
>> Commit-ID:  7c4c3a0f18ba57ea2a2985034532303d2929902a
>> Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/7c4c3a0f18ba57ea2a2985034532303d2929902a
>> Author:     David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
>> AuthorDate: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 11:35:44 +0100
>> Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>> CommitDate: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 23:15:06 +0200
>>
>> hrtimers: Support resuming with two or more CPUs online (but stopped)
>>
>> hrtimers_resume() only reprograms the timers for the current CPU as it
>> assumes that all other CPUs are offline at this point in the resume
>> process. If other CPUs are online then their timers will not be
>> corrected and they may fire at the wrong time.
>>
>> When running as a Xen guest, this assumption is not true.  Non-boot
>> CPUs are only stopped with IRQs disabled instead of offlining them.
>> This is a performance optimization as disabling the CPUs would add an
>> unacceptable amount of additional downtime during a live migration (>
>> 200 ms for a 4 VCPU guest).
>>
>> hrtimers_resume() cannot call on_each_cpu(retrigger_next_event,...)
>> as the other CPUs will be stopped with IRQs disabled.  Instead, defer
>> the call to the next softirq.
>>
>> [ tglx: Separated the xen change out ]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
>> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk  <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
>> Cc: John Stultz  <john.stultz@...aro.org>
>> Cc: <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>
>> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1372329348-20841-2-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>> ---
>>  kernel/hrtimer.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
>>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/hrtimer.c b/kernel/hrtimer.c
>> index fd4b13b..e86827e 100644
>> --- a/kernel/hrtimer.c
>> +++ b/kernel/hrtimer.c
>> @@ -773,15 +773,24 @@ void clock_was_set(void)
>>  
>>  /*
>>   * During resume we might have to reprogram the high resolution timer
>> - * interrupt (on the local CPU):
>> + * interrupt on all online CPUs.  However, all other CPUs will be
>> + * stopped with IRQs interrupts disabled so the clock_was_set() call
>> + * must be deferred to the softirq.
>> + *
>> + * The one-shot timer has already been programmed to fire immediately
>> + * (see tick_resume_oneshot()) and this interrupt will trigger the
>> + * softirq to run early enough to correctly reprogram the timers on
>> + * all CPUs.
>>   */
>>  void hrtimers_resume(void)
>>  {
>> +	struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base = &__get_cpu_var(hrtimer_bases);
>> +
>>  	WARN_ONCE(!irqs_disabled(),
>>  		  KERN_INFO "hrtimers_resume() called with IRQs enabled!");
>>  
>> -	retrigger_next_event(NULL);
>> -	timerfd_clock_was_set();
>> +	cpu_base->clock_was_set = 1;
>> +	__raise_softirq_irqoff(HRTIMER_SOFTIRQ);
>>  }
>>  
>>  static inline void timer_stats_hrtimer_set_start_info(struct hrtimer *timer)
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ