[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACQ1gAj9bY9Tw2-Ps7-Bm2-gS0PY=hocRPvXCQhmcQ9-sKg1kQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 17:16:03 +0200
From: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
To: Bo Shen <voice.shen@...el.com>
Cc: devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 02/13] misc: atmel_ssc: keep the count of pdev->id
2013/7/2 Bo Shen <voice.shen@...el.com>:
> Hi Richard,
>
>
> On 7/1/2013 16:39, Richard Genoud wrote:
>>
>> With device tree, pdev->id is always -1, so we introduce a local
>> counter.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c b/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c
>> index 3afbd82..d1ec5ab 100644
>> --- a/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c
>> @@ -173,6 +173,12 @@ out:
>> return err;
>> }
>>
>> +/* counter of ssc devive instances.
>> + * With device tree pdev->id is always -1, so we have to keep the
>> + * count ourselves
>> + */
>> +static int ssc_device_id;
>
>
> Do we really need this? If Yes, would it better to get from device through
> of_alias_get_id?
you're right, it seems that we don't need that anymore.
thanks !
Richard.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists