[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fbeb6f36-f07a-4518-b6f2-0b8e36028fe9@CH1EHSMHS012.ehs.local>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 08:43:11 -0700
From: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource/cadence_ttc: Reuse clocksource as sched_clock
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 08:30:47AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
>
> > Reuse the TTC clocksource timer as sched clock, too. Since only a single
> > sched clock is supported in Linux, this feature optional and can be
> > selected through Kconfig.
>
> This changelog doesn't make sense.
>
> There can be only one active sched_clock, but that does no mean, that
> you cannot have different implementations compiled in.
>
> So if you disable this config which sched_clock is your kernel using?
Jiffies
> And if you enable it, how is guaranteed that you end up with the ttc
> sched_clock as the active one? Just due to initcall ordering?
I assumed so. Is there a different mechanism?
Sören
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists