[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1307052217500.32106@ionos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 22:19:20 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"Chandramouleeswaran, Aswin" <aswin@...com>,
"Norton, Scott J" <scott.norton@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/12] spinlock: Enable x86 architecture to do lockless
refcount update
On Fri, 5 Jul 2013, Waiman Long wrote:
> There are two steps to enable each architecture to do lockless
> reference count update:
> 1. Define the ARCH_SPINLOCK_REFCOUNT config parameter in its Kconfig
> file.
No, we select GENERIC_SPINLOCK_REFCOUNT unless we provide an
architecture specific implementation. In that case we select
ARCH_SPINLOCK_REFCOUNT.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists