[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1307052259090.32106@ionos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 22:59:53 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
cc: Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource/cadence_ttc: Reuse clocksource as
sched_clock
On Fri, 5 Jul 2013, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 10:42:03PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > We have a mechanism for that in place, if stuff goes cross trees. One
> > of the trees provides a set of commit for the other tree to pull, so
> > we do not end up with merge dependencies and conflicts.
> >
> > Why is clocksource stuff going through armsoc unless it contains
> > related modifications in arch/arm/
> We overhauled Zynq's common clock code and migrated all Zynq drivers to
> it - the TTC being one. I'm pretty sure you were on the CC list for that
> change.
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=30e1e28598c2674c133148d8aec6d431d7acd314
>
That's fine as it has no dependencies on any of the clocksource core
changes AFAICT.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists