[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130705101446.48deb2694f5fcdb060f41e5b@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 10:14:46 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Chen Gang F T <chen.gang.flying.transformer@...il.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
David Sharp <dhsharp@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
uml-devel <user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
uml-user <user-mode-linux-user@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Kosina <trivial@...nel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] include/asm-generic/io.h: add dummy fuctions to support
'COMPILE_TEST' in 'asm-generic'.
Hi,
On Fri, 05 Jul 2013 08:03:31 +0800 Chen Gang F T <chen.gang.flying.transformer@...il.com> wrote:
>
> When a module select "COMPILE_TEST=y" (e.g with allmodconfig), it has
> right to compile under the architecture which no related HW support.
>
> If it can not pass compiling, at least it is not the module's issue,
> neither the architecture's issue.
>
> We have to look for who has duty on it. At least now, it seems only
> 'asm-generic' can be qualified to play this unlucky role.
You keep saying this, but others have told you that this is not the
problem.
> Could you provide your suggestions or completions for this issue ?
If something doesn't build for a particular config, then either it needs
to be fixed or excluded from building in that particular config.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists