[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130705071901.GB24783@somewhere.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 09:19:02 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: scheduling while atomic & hang.
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 08:51:13AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>
> > On 07/03/2013 07:49 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > >> [<ffffffff816f42bf>] __schedule+0x94f/0x9c0
> > >> [<ffffffff816f487e>] schedule_user+0x2e/0x70
> > >> [<ffffffff816f6de4>] retint_careful+0x12/0x2e
> >
> > This call trace does indeed indicate that we took a hardware
> > interrupt which caused a reschedule. It doesn't necessarily have to
> > be a quantum expiration interrupt, it could just as easily be an I/O
> > completion interrupt.
>
> Too bad the kernel stack frame at this point is so small [we are just
> before return to userspace], so we don't really get our usual trace of
> recent activities via the '?' entries ...
>
> It would be nice to have a full-kernel-stack backtrace printout as an
> option, which prints entries 'above' the current RSP.
>
> I've Cc:-ed Frederic, maybe he has interest in implementing that?
Yeah that sounds interesting. I may give it a try.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists