[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1373112686-28501-4-git-send-email-artagnon@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 17:41:26 +0530
From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...il.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] irq: add lock annotation to squelch a sparse warning
__irq_put_desc_unlock() releases &desc->lock, but being a static
analyzer, sparse emits a warning:
context imbalance in '__irq_put_desc_unlock' - unexpected unlock
Help it by annotating the function with a __release. Do not annotate
its counterpart which acquires the lock, __irq_get_desc_lock(), because
it does so conditionally.
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...il.com>
---
kernel/irq/irqdesc.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c b/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
index 192a302..d6bc26a 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
@@ -449,6 +449,7 @@ __irq_get_desc_lock(unsigned int irq, unsigned long *flags, bool bus,
}
void __irq_put_desc_unlock(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned long flags, bool bus)
+ __releases(&desc->lock)
{
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
if (bus)
--
1.8.3.2.733.gf8abaeb
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists