[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jKrW4t0HxBiinYTQs9eun_Z+bkNCjKgM_RYaL6Vz1PsoA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 06:09:50 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Ankita Garg <ankita@...ibm.com>,
Simon Kagstrom <simon.kagstrom@...insight.net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] lkdtm: fix stack protector trigger
Hi,
I'd like to get this series added to lkdtm. Can someone take a moment
to review or ack them?
Thanks,
-Kees
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> The -fstack-protector compiler flag will only build stack protections if
> a character array is seen. Additionally, the offset to the saved
> instruction pointer changes based on architecture, so stomp much harder
> (64 bytes) when corrupting the stack.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> ---
> drivers/misc/lkdtm.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm.c
> index 08aad69..adb6bde 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm.c
> @@ -295,10 +295,10 @@ static void lkdtm_do_action(enum ctype which)
> (void) recursive_loop(0);
> break;
> case CT_CORRUPT_STACK: {
> - volatile u32 data[8];
> - volatile u32 *p = data;
> + /* Make sure the compiler creates and uses an 8 char array. */
> + volatile char data[8];
>
> - p[12] = 0x12345678;
> + memset((void *)data, 0, 64);
> break;
> }
> case CT_UNALIGNED_LOAD_STORE_WRITE: {
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists