[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51DA28D2.9030104@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 10:49:54 +0800
From: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: smart wake-affine
On 07/07/2013 02:43 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 14:16 +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
>
>> PeterZ has suggested some optimization which I sent out yesterday, I
>> suppose they haven't been included into this test yet, correct?
>
> No, that was with both v3 patches applied. hackbench -l 1000 delta
> tracked to next pull/build fwiw, but I don't see anything noteworthy
> elsewhere, so I'm filing it under "tasks/core ~= zillion ~= hohum".
I see, thanks for the testing, Mike :)
I still can't reproduce the issue on my box, so I suggest we put down
this temporarily, if later more similar report show up, let's try to
catch the point.
BTW, could you please show me the '/proc/cpuinfo' of your box? I'd like
to collect some data for analyse later ;-)
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
> -Mike
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists