linux-kernel - Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: dm-devel@...hat.com is a list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 8 Jul 2013 18:10:09 +0100
From:	Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
To:	Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@...eya.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: dm-devel@...hat.com is a list

On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 05:01:47PM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote:
> This patch changes type of dm-devel@...hat.com
> The output of ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl is
> modified to report dm-devel@...hat.com as a list:
 
>  DEVICE-MAPPER  (LVM)
>  M:	Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
> -M:	dm-devel@...hat.com
>  L:	dm-devel@...hat.com
>  W:	http://sources.redhat.com/dm
>  Q:	http://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dm-devel/list/

Is this part of some other changes to the definition of M and L?

Otherwise I don't agree with the change.

MAINTAINERS states:

        M: Mail patches to: FullName <address@...ain>
        L: Mailing list that is relevant to this area

In the case of dm-devel, it's not merely a "relevant" list, but it is
essential for us: patches to dm must be sent to the list for patchwork
to collect.  I shall also add Mike Snitzer as a joint maintainer.

And did you notice this bit with uapi?
F:      include/linux/dm-*.h

Alasdair

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/