[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130708171009.GA4870@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 18:10:09 +0100
From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
To: Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@...eya.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: dm-devel@...hat.com is a list
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 05:01:47PM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote:
> This patch changes type of dm-devel@...hat.com
> The output of ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl is
> modified to report dm-devel@...hat.com as a list:
> DEVICE-MAPPER (LVM)
> M: Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
> -M: dm-devel@...hat.com
> L: dm-devel@...hat.com
> W: http://sources.redhat.com/dm
> Q: http://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dm-devel/list/
Is this part of some other changes to the definition of M and L?
Otherwise I don't agree with the change.
MAINTAINERS states:
M: Mail patches to: FullName <address@...ain>
L: Mailing list that is relevant to this area
In the case of dm-devel, it's not merely a "relevant" list, but it is
essential for us: patches to dm must be sent to the list for patchwork
to collect. I shall also add Mike Snitzer as a joint maintainer.
And did you notice this bit with uapi?
F: include/linux/dm-*.h
Alasdair
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists