linux-kernel - Re: [v9fs:for-linus 7/7] ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1373255644.1893.3.camel@joe-AO722>
Date:	Sun, 07 Jul 2013 20:54:04 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc:	Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
	Jim Garlick <garlick@...l.gov>,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v9fs:for-linus 7/7] ERROR: code indent should use tabs where
 possible

On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 11:30 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> In long run I'd like to disable
> the check types that tend to have false positives.  As for now, these
> checks are disabled in my checkpatch robot:

Are you using a .checkpatch.conf file?

> PATCH_PREFIX
> LONG_LINE
> CAMELCASE

That's a --strict test

> MISSING_SIGN_OFF

Why would you even consider this one?

> COMPLEX_MACRO
> BRACES
> SPACING
> LONG_LINE

OK by me.

> REDUNDANT_CODE

Also a --strict test

> TRAILING_STATEMENTS

False positives?  Got an example?

> UNCOMMENTED_DEFINITION


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/