| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <51DB069C.1010607@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 11:36:12 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com> CC: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, "linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] EFI changes for v3.11 On 07/08/2013 10:29 AM, Luck, Tony wrote: >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Tony Luck (1): >>> [IA64] sim: Add casts to avoid assignment warnings >>> >>> arch/ia64/hp/sim/boot/fw-emu.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- >>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >> >> I don't see this commit in Linus' tree so presumably Tony is still >> seeing these warnings. > > Correct - I see 10 warning about "assignment makes pointer from integer" > when building Linus' tree (HEAD = d2b4a646). > > My patch doesn't appear to be in linux-next either (next-20130708). > > I had hoped to have this patch follow in the same path that the > one that changed the types and introduced the warnings took ... > but since that didn't work perhaps I should just ask Linus to pull > it from my ia64 tree. > I can push it, although it seems a bit odd to me to push an ia64-only patch through the x86 tree. Let me know what you prefer. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists