linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv3] uml: Fix which_tmpdir failure when /dev/shm is a symlink, and in other edge cases

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51DB20CB.9020706@nod.at>
Date:	Mon, 08 Jul 2013 22:27:55 +0200
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:	Tristan Schmelcher <tschmelcher@...gle.com>
CC:	jdike@...toit.com, user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] uml: Fix which_tmpdir failure when /dev/shm is a symlink,
 and in other edge cases

Am 08.07.2013 22:19, schrieb Tristan Schmelcher:
> From: Tristan Schmelcher <tschmelcher@...gle.com>
> 
> which_tmpdir did the wrong thing if /dev/shm was a symlink (e.g., to /run/shm),
> if there were multiple mounts on top of each other, if the mount(s) were
> obscured by a later mount, or if /dev/shm was a prefix of another mount point.
> This fixes these cases. Applies to 3.9.6.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tristan Schmelcher <tschmelcher@...gle.com>

Is this just a resend or did your alter the patch you sent me already?
I'm about to send my UML patches to Linus tomorrow.

Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/