[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130708203435.GB2596@localhost>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 17:34:37 -0300
From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: George Cherian <george.cherian@...com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
balbi@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
kishon@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add phy support for AM335X platform using Generic
PHy framework
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:44:33PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> We need two nodes each one with a glue layer and a musb child node. The
> instances crap in kernel has to vanish. Also that means your phy nodes
> are wrong. This is not musb with two ports but two musb instances each
> with one port.
>
I agree completely. The current DT representation looks definitely odd,
and we should be looking at improving it.
I wonder if this is now possible, given the DT is supposed to be stable ABI.
--
Ezequiel GarcĂa, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists