[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1373326425.8183.184@snotra>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 18:33:45 -0500
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To: Gupta Ruchika-R66431 <R66431@...escale.com>
CC: "linuxppc-dev@...ux.freescale.net" <linuxppc-dev@...ux.freescale.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linuxppc-dev] Unbinding device from a driver
On 07/04/2013 05:35:28 AM, Gupta Ruchika-R66431 wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am trying to unbind a platform device from a driver. Even when the
> remove function of the device returns an EBUSY error, the device is
> unbound from the driver. Is this the right behavior ? Why does kernel
> forcefully unbind the device even if device remove function returns
> an error ?
From looking at the code, it seems it's not allowed for a driver to
refuse the unbinding. If you can't unbind yet, you need to block until
you can (and take measures to ensure that it won't take too long).
I don't know the history of why the remove method can return an error
even though nothing seems to check it.
> root@...80ds: ls
>
> bind ffe301000.jr ffe302000.jr ffe303000.jr ffe304000.jr uevent
> unbind
>
>
>
> root@...80ds: echo ffe301000.jr > unbind
>
> In caam_jr_remove
>
> caam_jr ffe301000.jr: Device Busy
Is the caam_jr driver printing this, or the device model infrastructure?
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists