[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130709080744.GH25631@dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 10:07:45 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] tracing/kprobe: Wait for disabling all running
kprobe handlers
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 05:01:45PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> + if (wait) {
> + /*
> + * synchronize with kprobe_trace_func/kretprobe_trace_func
> + * to ensure disabled (all running handlers are finished)
> + */
> + synchronize_sched();
> + kfree(link); /* Ignored if link == NULL */
> + }
What's not clear to me from this comment is if we're only waiting for kfree()?
In that case shouldn't we use call_rcu() to free the thing? Or do we need the
sync_sched() for other purposes as well?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists