linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Minor perf build fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALkWK0mHeVnHhzug2pkuAbvnvnynQEbMipzCC702xFt9-3k0tA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 9 Jul 2013 14:21:35 +0530
From:	Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...il.com>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Minor perf build fixes

Hi Namhyung,

Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Fri,  5 Jul 2013 15:46:13 +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
>> [3/4] introduces a util/perf-perl.h to include <perl.h> with #pragma
>> statements, hence eliminating duplication.  It then updates Context.xs
>> and trace-event-perl.c to use this new header.
>
> I prefer the name being "perl.h" and use #include_next as we include the
> 'util' directory in the compiler search path.
>
> Other than that, the change looks good to me.

Thanks for teaching me about #include_next.  I'll post a re-roll shortly.

>> Also, notice that feature-tests.mak has not been touched in this
>> iteration: the Perl check passes without needing the #pragma
>> statements (although I'm not sure why exactly).
>
> I guess it's because FLAGS_PERL_EMBED doesn't contain the usual perf
> CFLAGS which has -Werror.

Ah.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/