[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130709093045.GJ4898@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 12:30:45 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/8] ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Unified notify handler
for hotplug events
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 02:19:04AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp.h
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp.h
> @@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ struct acpiphp_context {
> acpi_handle handle;
> struct acpiphp_func *func;
> struct acpiphp_bridge *bridge;
> + bool handler_for_func:1;
Hmm, should it be just plain:
bool handler_for_func;
? What's the reason using bitfields for bool?
> };
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists