[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1373332406.7397.161.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:13:26 -0700
From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Asias He <asias@...hat.com>,
target-devel <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vhost tree with the
target-updates tree
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 13:47 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the vhost tree got a conflict in
> drivers/vhost/scsi.c between commit 084ed45b3846 ("vhost/scsi: Convert to
> se_cmd->cmd_kref TARGET_SCF_ACK_KREF usage") from the target-updates tree
> and commit 3c63f66a0dcd ("vhost-scsi: Rename struct tcm_vhost_cmd *tv_cmd
> to *cmd") from the vhost tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).
>
Hi Stephen,
Can you briefly refresh my memory how the process of 'carrying the fix'
in linux-next should work..?
So once I send a -rc1 PULL request to Linus over the next days, and MST
sends one shortly there-after and hits a conflict, you'll include this
patch in a separate next-fixes branch for Linus to PULL..?
--nab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists