linux-kernel - Re: dell_rbu: Select CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 09 Jul 2013 16:45:03 +0200
From:	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To:	Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
Cc:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: dell_rbu: Select CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER explicitly

At Tue, 9 Jul 2013 22:39:36 +0800,
Ming Lei wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> wrote:
> > At Tue, 9 Jul 2013 16:43:30 +0800,
> >> Actually from view of distribution, dell rbu has to be compiled in, then
> >> no code size can be saved any more, which means looks the introduced
> >> option in this patch isn't necessary.
> >
> > Well, but it means that there is no way not to compile user-helper
> > mode code in firmware_class.c.  In other words, in which condition,
> > request_firmware_user() will be compiled?
> 
> It can be always compiled in. Basically dell rbu is always enabled in
> distributions, which means the user helper code has to be compiled in.

But how non-distro kernel disables this being built-in...?
Or do you suggest to enable the user-helper codes always built, no
matter whether it's used or not?


Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/