[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <51DC406202000078000E39B2@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 15:54:58 +0100
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc: "Borislav Petkov" <bp@...en8.de>, "Matt Wilson" <msw@...zon.com>,
"Michael Opdenacker" <michael.opdenacker@...e-electrons.com>,
<jeremy@...p.org>, <x86@...nel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Paul Bolle" <pebolle@...cali.nl>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: remove unused Kconfig parameter
>>> On 09.07.13 at 16:48, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
> Dom0 has been both - but there is nothing wrong with seperating these
> two labels. And therein I was thinking that the 'hardware backend domain'
> should be the introduced. I am not good with names so the best option
> seems CONFIG_XEN_PRIVILIGED, but that sounds to be like 'controlling
> domain'.
>
> Any good ideas for names? CONFIG_XEN_HARDWARE_DOMAIN ?
> CONFIG_XEN_PRIVILIGED_DOMAIN?
Following the naming in the hypervisor, CONFIG_XEN_HARDWARE_DOMAIN
and CONFIG_XEN_CONTROL_DOMAIN would seem reasonable to me.
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists