[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51DC33E7.1030404@de.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 18:01:43 +0200
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: Dominik Dingel <dingel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang@...el.com>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] PF: Provide additional direct page notification
On 09/07/13 15:56, Dominik Dingel wrote:
> By setting a Kconfig option, the architecture can control when
> guest notifications will be presented by the apf backend.
> So there is the default batch mechanism, working as before, where the vcpu thread
> should pull in this information. On the other hand there is now the direct
> mechanism, this will directly push the information to the guest.
>
> Still the vcpu thread should call check_completion to cleanup leftovers,
> that leaves most of the common code untouched.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dominik Dingel <dingel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
for the "why". We want to use the existing architectured interface.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists