linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] Platform Framebuffers and SimpleDRM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51DC7A80.9030201@wwwdotorg.org>
Date:	Tue, 09 Jul 2013 15:02:56 -0600
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] Platform Framebuffers and SimpleDRM

On 07/04/2013 06:25 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
> 
> This series changes the way we handle firmware framebuffers on x86 systems. On
> other architectures the recently introduced "simple-framebuffer"
> platform-devices provide a sane and proper way to handle firmware framebuffers.
> So why not use it on x86, too?

Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>

(This time I didn't see any issue with the FB content being blank; I
must have forgotten a console= command-line parameter or something the
last time around)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/