[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201307100005.21769.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:05:21 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Neil Zhang <zhangwm@...vell.com>
Cc: grant.likely@...aro.org, haojian.zhuang@...il.com,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Chao Xie <chao.xie@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/3] ARM: mmp: bring up pxa988 with device tree support
On Tuesday 09 July 2013, Neil Zhang wrote:
> + soc {
> + compatible = "simple-bus";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> + ranges;
> +
> + gic: interrupt-controller@...fe100 {
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic";
> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + interrupt-controller;
> + reg = <0xd1dff000 0x1000>,
> + <0xd1dfe100 0x0100>;
> + };
> +
> + L2: l2-cache-controller@...fb000 {
> + compatible = "arm,pl310-cache";
> + reg = <0xd1dfb000 0x1000>;
> + arm,data-latency = <2 1 1>;
> + arm,tag-latency = <2 1 1>;
> + arm,pwr-dynamic-clk-gating;
> + arm,pwr-standby-mode;
> + cache-unified;
> + cache-level = <2>;
> + };
> +
> + local-timer@...fe600 {
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-twd-timer";
> + reg = <0xd1dfe600 0x20>;
> + interrupts = <1 13 0x304>;
> + };
> +
> + axi@...00000 { /* AXI */
> + compatible = "simple-bus";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> + ranges = <0xd4200000 0xd4200000 0x00200000>;
> +
> + intc: wakeupgen@...82000 {
> + compatible = "marvell,mmp-intc";
> + reg = <0xd4282000 0x1000>;
> + marvell,intc-wakeup = <0x114 0x3
> + 0x144 0x3>;
> + };
> + };
I am guessing that the structure does not actually reflect the hardware.
Shouldn't AXI be the top-level bus, with the other stuff under it?
> +
> +
> + uart1: uart@...17000 {
> + compatible = "marvell,mmp-uart";
> + reg = <0xd4017000 0x1000>;
> + interrupts = <0 27 0x4>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
The uart node should be called "serial@...17000" instead of "uart@...17000".
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mmp/reset.c b/arch/arm/mach-mmp/reset.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..b90ec54
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mmp/reset.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
> +/*
> + * linux/arch/arm/mach-mmp/reset.c
I think this could just be part of the smp.c file.
> + *
> + * Author: Neil Zhang <zhangwm@...vell.com>
> + * Copyright: (C) 2012 Marvell International Ltd.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> + * (at your option) any later version.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/smp.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/io.h>
> +#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> +#include <asm/mach/map.h>
> +
> +#include <mach/addr-map.h>
> +
> +#include "reset.h"
> +
> +#define PMU_CC2_AP APMU_REG(0x0100)
> +#define CIU_CA9_WARM_RESET_VECTOR CIU_REG(0x00d8)
You should not hardcode the addresses here, better find them from the device tree.
> +
> +#define CPU_CORE_RST(n) (1 << ((n) * 4 + 16))
> +#define CPU_DBG_RST(n) (1 << ((n) * 4 + 18))
> +#define CPU_WDOG_RST(n) (1 << ((n) * 4 + 19))
This should probably go into a reset controller driver, in drivers/reset/
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists