[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51DB7AF7.50708@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 10:52:39 +0800
From: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: smart wake-affine
On 07/09/2013 10:36 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
[snip]
>> 2. is the 3.10-rc5 in image also disabled the hyperthreading?
>
> Yes, I happened to have data already collected for 3.10-rc5. While the
> runs with this patch was with -rc7, unless there was some performance
> related commit I missed, I don't think the performance difference was
> because of that.
>
>> 3. is the v3 patch set show the same issue?
>
> Uhmmm shoot, I didn't realize there was a v3, sorry about that.
>
> /me takes another look at the thread.
V3 will reduce the overhead, should make things better, especially when
workload is high and platform is big (your box is really what I desired
;-), honestly).
And if it is possible, comparison based on the same basement will be
better :)
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
> Thanks,
> Davidlohr
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists